This is not the Iraq vote. (BTW - Given Obama's voting history in the Illinois senate suggests that he would have probably voted "Present" on the AUMF.)
But back to the gas tax. If Obama had more political experience, he would have seen this to be a GOP bear trap and had joined Clinton in saying, "Why, Yes!" "And while we are at it, let's tax windfall profits, too."
Two can play the beartrap game. Hillary can. Obama can't.
You're attempted diversion of the topic has failed horribly.
Doesn't matter if this is the Iraq vote. It's the same underlying disrespect to the country. If Sen. Clinton doesn't know that she's wrong or doesn't want to listen to experts then she's not qualified to be President. If Sen. Clinton does know that she's wrong and is pandering for votes in a way that will damage our country in the long run then she doesn't deserve to be president.
No, amigo.
YOU were the one who brought up the Iraq vote. So spare me the "diversionary" lecture.
Gawd, many Obama supporters have a case of inflated righteousness today. I think I'll just go write Senator Lamont about all of this. Because people who think their position is so much more righteous than others really do well in elections.
Yes and my mention of the Iraq war pandering was relevant. Your attempt to say Sen. Obama did something wrong was a diversionary tactic which has failed woefully.
When her own party disagrees with her and the experts disagree with her and her people say that she won't listen to the experts she's gone off the deep end.
*your